Yeah, there is another side to this argument

The Lexington Herald Leader has a column this morning about Congressional earmarks in which they couldn't find anyone who is against the redistributive nature of pulling so much money of private hands that politicians get to build their political careers on pulling some of back and deciding who gets it.

Bruce Lunsford had a chance to really score points on Sen. Mitch McConnell, but he punted:

"Lunsford couldn't cite a McConnell-secured earmark for Kentucky with which to quibble."

Republicans give fiscal conservatives precious little to support on this front but the "we can pour out the slop better than they can" approach is certainly not a winner.

The Club for Growth of Kentucky has a very interesting take on this. If tax revenues are high enough to fund bovine flatulence studies and the mating habits of hummingbirds, think how much more productive that money would be in what is left of our private sector.