A Hidden Casino Cost I Hadn't Considered
The case of a Louisville woman caught embezzling $7 million from an Indiana credit union to spend in Indiana casinos -- math majors will note the money is gone -- is interesting mainly because of the size of the theft.
But what caught my eye in the press release was this:
As Head Teller she was responsible for ordering and accounting for all cash replenishments for the credit union. She was also responsible for reconciling and overseeing vault activity. She also was responsible for the general ledger and reconciling the vault cash account to the physical count of cash on hand.
Part of her job was to prevent herself from embezzling funds which she, of course, failed to do. The credit union needs another employee or two.
So not only are the customers of the credit union out millions, but they will be hit again as the credit union has to hire more people for oversight to prevent this kind of fraud in the future.
There are a lot of businesses that handle large amounts of cash. If each of them has to go out and hire another layer of bookkeeping support to prevent this kind of embezzlement, we are looking at significant added costs to be passed along to customers.
And while Patricia Sherman is a guest of federal taxpayers for the next few years, whatever benefit Indiana taxpayers get from casinos may get sliced if Kentucky or Ohio start to play the same game.





9 Comments:
You make a good point, this will not matter to those state officials that are pushing expanded gambling. As a matter of fact, there is nothing that can be said or pointed out that would matter to them. Their minds are made up.
The point can be used in avertising when the issue goes on the ballot. However it will be lost in the millions of dollars that will be spent by casino companies and other pro-gambling interests in their media campaign.
The customers of the credit union probably won't have to buck up since every bank has fidelity insurance.
In a way, the $7,000,000 was distributed in part through the community and perhaps enjoyed a remarkable trickle down and multiplier effect.
I'm not for casinos, but the bank didn't lose and there is no evidence the money didn't get injected into the economy.
1:28,
Jumping through the hoops to get the fidelity claim paid will be a lot of fun. It's hardly a slam dunk they will get their money back. The credit union (owned by its customers) will pay through the nose for this for a long time.
And most of multiplier effect you are looking for attached to the stolen and gambled money took place a lot closer to the casino owners in Las Vegas, rather than in the local community. And figuring out an estimate of how much of casino tax revenues are derived from money actually stolen (and not just cannibalized) from local businesses would be another interesting project.
It's pretty hard to consider something like this a victimless crime when there are so many victims.
1:28 is Beshear's new economic development czar. Slogan: Kentucky, where fraud pays.
A typical case of the fox guarding the hen house here. This needs to be exploited by the anti-casino folks ASAP as proof of the negative results of casinos, or gambling in general.
Will Indiana refund to KY the costs associated with these folks losing their jobs, etc.? Heh heh heh.
Each account is covered by NCUA up to 100,000 dollars but we all pay for this one way or another folks.
The bank DID lose folks. They are now bankrupt, boom, out of here.
People are out of work.
FREEOURPOWS
But, these casinos are for the children.
So what happended to the GOP mantra 'personal responsibility'?
When did you guys become the nanny?
I'm still all for personal responsibility, 2:07. If everyone who goes into a Kentucky casino promises to never ask for or accept welfare, food stamps, or EITC for themselves or any immediate family members, I will vote for casinos and lobby to have the first one built in Jessamine county.
Well said KP!
FREEOURPOWS
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home