"Here's a question to mull over the holiday season: By giving a tax-break to families instead of employers, could the Canadian government be en route (very tentatively) to more patient-friendly health care than the American government, which appears wedded to the goverment-corporate status quo?"Read the whole thing here. Canada has done a fair bit of socialism the last few decades. Might be worth considering why they are looking in the opposite direction.
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
As America moves to the left
Interesting post from native Canadian think tanker home for the holidays reading about healthcare reform north of the border:
Keeping it simple would help Kentucky
An essay out today could almost have been written for Kentucky (the numbers are different and we don't have ports, but the rest fits well). It has great advice we can apply in Kentucky:
The rest of the essay is here. Zero-based budgeting would require the state to justify everything it spends. (Imagine that!)
And if we got the government to focus on a few things, there would be fewer painful and expensive mistakes from which to recover.
"It might well have been better to implement these budget savings several years ago, when the economy was stronger and policymakers had the luxury of taking their time. But such foresight appears to be contrary to human nature, or at least to the nature of those who wield political power in our state (and beyond)."
The rest of the essay is here. Zero-based budgeting would require the state to justify everything it spends. (Imagine that!)
And if we got the government to focus on a few things, there would be fewer painful and expensive mistakes from which to recover.
Perspective on Toyota's "operating" loss
The sky isn't falling on Toyota and the difference is as simple as operating versus actual losses.
Toyota yesterday predicted its first annual operating loss since 1938. That means the company's primary business operation -- making and selling cars -- cost more than the revenues gained from the same. For one year. In a down economy.
Some are comparing this to the Big Three as a way to take heat off the United Auto Workers union. Bluegrass Roots exults:
This is inaccurate. Toyota didn't post a loss and they are not likely to any time soon. When you combine Toyota's operating loss with the surplus from their investments, fringe benefits, and all the other financial activity outside of their core business, Toyota is still profitable.
Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors can't say the same thing and the main difference is labor costs. That is why no one at Toyota is talking about needing a bailout from anyone and GM and Chrysler are now being bailed out by Canada.
By the way, The Lexington Herald Leader's coverage of this operating loss is only slightly better than the left-wing blogs. And that is only because the Herald Leader left the word "operating" in their story. They still could have easily given the rest of the story, though that may have conflicted with an agenda.
Toyota yesterday predicted its first annual operating loss since 1938. That means the company's primary business operation -- making and selling cars -- cost more than the revenues gained from the same. For one year. In a down economy.
Some are comparing this to the Big Three as a way to take heat off the United Auto Workers union. Bluegrass Roots exults:
"Yes, today Toyota with no union workers and what so many try to say is such a superior product is posting a loss for the first time in 70 years themselves."
This is inaccurate. Toyota didn't post a loss and they are not likely to any time soon. When you combine Toyota's operating loss with the surplus from their investments, fringe benefits, and all the other financial activity outside of their core business, Toyota is still profitable.
Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors can't say the same thing and the main difference is labor costs. That is why no one at Toyota is talking about needing a bailout from anyone and GM and Chrysler are now being bailed out by Canada.
By the way, The Lexington Herald Leader's coverage of this operating loss is only slightly better than the left-wing blogs. And that is only because the Herald Leader left the word "operating" in their story. They still could have easily given the rest of the story, though that may have conflicted with an agenda.
Monday, December 22, 2008
What's going on at The Bluegrass Institute
The Bluegrass Policy Blog will stay active all through the holiday season. Please check it out. Kentucky Votes is temporarily a mess. Stuck in the middle of a major upgrade. I believe it will be a super great site sometime before the General Assembly goes into session. Could be any day now. I'll keep you posted.
Pushing all levels of government in Kentucky to open up and show taxpayers what's going on will be our main theme in 2009.
Stay tuned...
Pushing all levels of government in Kentucky to open up and show taxpayers what's going on will be our main theme in 2009.
Stay tuned...
Bad news inside the bad news
Kentucky's state government announced November's unemployment estimate reached 7%. The worst part of the news release was not about where jobs are being lost, however. It's about where jobs are being gained.
You have three guesses and the first two don't count:
This is why Frankfort politicians get so mealy-mouthed when you ask them why they don't just cut government spending.
The time to shrink the government sector is now.
You have three guesses and the first two don't count:
"The government sector, which includes public education, public administration agencies and state-owned hospitals, gained 500 positions in November 2008. The sector has added 10,000 jobs since November 2007."
This is why Frankfort politicians get so mealy-mouthed when you ask them why they don't just cut government spending.
The time to shrink the government sector is now.
Why transparency is needed in Kentucky schools
Kentucky Education Commissioner Jon Draud has been a disaster.
His taxpayer-provided luxury car is still in his driveway. His sneaky sick day grab was caught and returned to the taxpayers only to be given back to him by the General Assembly.
And now we find out he is being given a glowing review based on two do-nothing task forces he set up. From the Courier Journal:
If Kentucky school systems and the Kentucky Department of Education were required to post every single expenditure of taxpayer money within a week of contracting to spend it or, in the absence of a contract, writing the check, it would be much easier for taxpayers to keep track of what is being done to them.
We can talk about good government all we want to. But until the blinders are taken off, nothing will stop this kind of thing from happening over and over.
His taxpayer-provided luxury car is still in his driveway. His sneaky sick day grab was caught and returned to the taxpayers only to be given back to him by the General Assembly.
And now we find out he is being given a glowing review based on two do-nothing task forces he set up. From the Courier Journal:
"The state board evaluated Draud in August and was supposed to present him with the findings at its October meeting, which was postponed because of his stroke."
"In his evaluation, board members applauded Draud's effort in starting two major task forces: one on improving low-performing schools and another looking at the state's assessment and accountability system."
If Kentucky school systems and the Kentucky Department of Education were required to post every single expenditure of taxpayer money within a week of contracting to spend it or, in the absence of a contract, writing the check, it would be much easier for taxpayers to keep track of what is being done to them.
We can talk about good government all we want to. But until the blinders are taken off, nothing will stop this kind of thing from happening over and over.
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Ripped from The Lane Report
Kathy Gornik, president of THIEL Audio in Lexingon, sets the record straight on the silly idea that bureaucrats should be picking winners and losers in our economy and how market incentives, rather than government favors, would increase prosperity:
Read the whole article here.
Read the whole article here.
Projections
I was reading about President-elect Barack Obama's healthcare reform proposal tonight in a book called "Obamanomics." Found a very interesting passage about his plans to pay for universal coverage that sheds light on the idea of predicting the fiscal impact of most policy changes. I've marked portions of the paragraph and provided my thoughts below. All the numbers in parentheses and the italics were added by me:
(1) Really? With his plan to mandate no exclusions for pre-existing conditions, this claim is false by definition.
(2) Totally made up number. Like every other new government program, this probably understates the true cost dramatically.
(3) Ending which war? When? How? Might be interesting to see what the terrorists say about this one.
(4) This one already bit the dust.
(5) Significantly dumber and larger than Kentucky's cigarette tax increase but analogous in the sense that the stated purpose of the tax is for it to go to zero, but the dependence on the revenue will only grow.
(6) Swing-district Democrats probably will have to oppose this as it will be clearly seen as a heavy, new, widespread tax increase.
Making precise projections for the cost of starting a new program is a sure way to be proven wildly inaccurate by things that can't be predicted. Same goes for cutting programs. Might make for interesting conversation at cocktail parties, but the best you can really hope to do is get the direction of revenues and expenditures right.
And the bottom line is that the federal government and our state government are buying more government than they can afford. The only answer is to start deciding which programs we can live without and make plans to eliminate -- or at least shrink -- them.
"Obama expects that the (1)premiums paid by most Americans will decline and subsidies will be offered to more moderate-income people to allow them to buy into the plan. Of course, this is not all free. Obama's team estimates it should cost approximately (2)$100 billion a year. Obama does not intend to raise average Americans' taxes to pay for the plan, but rather intends to fund the plan from the government savings he expects we will get by pulling our troops out of Iraq and (3)ending the war, from the tax increase he proposes for (4)Americans earning over $250,000 per year, and from the money he raises by instituting a (5)carbon tax on carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, Obama will mandate that employers who are not currently paying for quality healthcare coverage for their employees will (6)have to contribute a percentage of their payroll costs to the plan."
(1) Really? With his plan to mandate no exclusions for pre-existing conditions, this claim is false by definition.
(2) Totally made up number. Like every other new government program, this probably understates the true cost dramatically.
(3) Ending which war? When? How? Might be interesting to see what the terrorists say about this one.
(4) This one already bit the dust.
(5) Significantly dumber and larger than Kentucky's cigarette tax increase but analogous in the sense that the stated purpose of the tax is for it to go to zero, but the dependence on the revenue will only grow.
(6) Swing-district Democrats probably will have to oppose this as it will be clearly seen as a heavy, new, widespread tax increase.
Making precise projections for the cost of starting a new program is a sure way to be proven wildly inaccurate by things that can't be predicted. Same goes for cutting programs. Might make for interesting conversation at cocktail parties, but the best you can really hope to do is get the direction of revenues and expenditures right.
And the bottom line is that the federal government and our state government are buying more government than they can afford. The only answer is to start deciding which programs we can live without and make plans to eliminate -- or at least shrink -- them.
Saturday, December 20, 2008
China's thugs make a Kentucky move
The Wall Street Journal reports China is blocking the New York Times web site.
That's almost as bad as Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear's move to take down web sites because he doesn't like their content.
Beshear's internet censorship case remains mired in a court battle. A Court of Appeals ruling may come in January.
The ACLU has joined the fight against Beshear because his actions violate the First Amendment. I'm not very comfortable being on the same side of an issue with the ACLU, but when they're right, they're right.
That's almost as bad as Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear's move to take down web sites because he doesn't like their content.
Beshear's internet censorship case remains mired in a court battle. A Court of Appeals ruling may come in January.
The ACLU has joined the fight against Beshear because his actions violate the First Amendment. I'm not very comfortable being on the same side of an issue with the ACLU, but when they're right, they're right.
Friday, December 19, 2008
Sales of garlic skyrocket in Kentucky
Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear wants to raise your taxes so badly, he can taste it.
Giving in to all his seductive cigarette tax increase nonsense is just like inviting Count Beshear into your house.
Where are my shoes?
President Bush is giving $17.4 billion to General Motors and Chrysler. That should get them through till spring. Then they'll be back for more and Ford will want their's, too.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Where we are headed
New York Gov. David Paterson has a plan to save the world one 65% fruit juice at a time. He wrote:
Something tells me the only thing Gov. Beshear saw in that passage was the $404 million.
"Nearly one out of every four New Yorkers under the age of 18 is obese. In many high-poverty areas, the rate is closer to one out of three."
"That is why, in the state budget I presented last Tuesday, I proposed a tax on sugared beverages like soda. Research has demonstrated that soft-drink consumption is one of the main drivers of childhood obesity."
"For example, a study by Harvard researchers found that each additional 12-ounce soft drink consumed per day increases the risk of a child becoming obese by 60 percent. For adults, the association is similar."
"If we are to succeed in reducing childhood obesity, we must reduce consumption of sugared beverages. That is the purpose of our proposed tax. We estimate that an 18 percent tax will reduce consumption by five percent."
"Our tax would apply only to sugared drinks -- including fruit drinks that are less than 70 percent juice -- that are nondiet. The $404 million this tax would raise next year will go toward funding public health programs, including obesity prevention programs, across New York state."
Something tells me the only thing Gov. Beshear saw in that passage was the $404 million.
Biggest issue in Kentucky right now
Kentucky's two biggest newspapers have been relentless in their pursuit of a seventy cent per pack cigarette tax increase. There is no bigger issue in the state and it has nothing to do with whether you smoke or not.
It's all about making government bigger.
The huge revenue projections for the tax increase ignore the entrepreneurs who currently pick up low-tax cigarettes in Kentucky and deliver them to other, higher-tax states. When the cigarette tax goes up in Kentucky, that inflow of cash will reverse course.
So the spending projections related to passage of the cigarette tax are bogus. But that isn't the point.
The point of this exercise is getting state legislators on the record voting for a tax increase to "solve" a fiscal problem. Tax increases don't solve fiscal problems.
Prove me wrong.
It's all about making government bigger.
The huge revenue projections for the tax increase ignore the entrepreneurs who currently pick up low-tax cigarettes in Kentucky and deliver them to other, higher-tax states. When the cigarette tax goes up in Kentucky, that inflow of cash will reverse course.
So the spending projections related to passage of the cigarette tax are bogus. But that isn't the point.
The point of this exercise is getting state legislators on the record voting for a tax increase to "solve" a fiscal problem. Tax increases don't solve fiscal problems.
Prove me wrong.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
As if...
Yahoo News has been talking all day about Barack Obama wanting to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to "save" the economy.
The silliness cuts both ways because, tonight, George Bush had this one:
Sure would be nice to get a president with a realistic view of his office's powers and abilities.
And how the free market works.
The silliness cuts both ways because, tonight, George Bush had this one:
"I'm not going to let this economy crater in order to preserve the free market system."
Sure would be nice to get a president with a realistic view of his office's powers and abilities.
And how the free market works.
Buying the cow when the milk could be free
Kentucky taxpayers are still paying lots of money for local governments to buy newspaper advertising space to display public notices. Sounds pretty 20th century to me.
And at first blush it seems the Kentucky Press Association, the state's newspaper trade association agrees. They are working to put all the state's public notices online and available to the public for free (click to expand):
But when anyone starts talking about repealing the law that requires local governments to purchase newspaper advertising, the newspaper folks go ballistic. David Thompson, executive director of the Kentucky Press Association said:
Well no kidding! Fortunately, there's this little thing called the internet that has come along in the last few years. It's much cheaper than sending out individual letters or buying expensive newspaper advertising.
The public notices law should be changed to stop requiring governments to buy advertising and instead require them to post public notices and all budget and spending data online.
And at first blush it seems the Kentucky Press Association, the state's newspaper trade association agrees. They are working to put all the state's public notices online and available to the public for free (click to expand):
But when anyone starts talking about repealing the law that requires local governments to purchase newspaper advertising, the newspaper folks go ballistic. David Thompson, executive director of the Kentucky Press Association said:
"A part of the public notice law allows smaller cities to mail their notices by first class mail, if the city can show it’s cheaper than publishing in the local newspaper. In the 22 years that’s been part of the law, not one single agency has found it cheaper to mail a notice by first class than by newspaper publication."
Well no kidding! Fortunately, there's this little thing called the internet that has come along in the last few years. It's much cheaper than sending out individual letters or buying expensive newspaper advertising.
The public notices law should be changed to stop requiring governments to buy advertising and instead require them to post public notices and all budget and spending data online.
"Time to lean"
Anyone who ever worked at McDonald's has been told many times "If you have time to lean, you have time to clean."
I'm guessing if President Barack Obama ushers the Service Employee International Union in behind the counter at the home of the Golden Arches, such an admonition will be deemed an abusive management tactic.
And Happy Meals will cost $12. And you will get yours when they are good and ready to give it to you.
The Obama/Pelosi/Reid effort to expand unions with the card check bill will whack our economy like a union thug whacks a scab.
I'm guessing if President Barack Obama ushers the Service Employee International Union in behind the counter at the home of the Golden Arches, such an admonition will be deemed an abusive management tactic.
And Happy Meals will cost $12. And you will get yours when they are good and ready to give it to you.
The Obama/Pelosi/Reid effort to expand unions with the card check bill will whack our economy like a union thug whacks a scab.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Why Republicans have lost Bailout Jam 2008
You may not have seen this ad on Kentucky blogs, but it's clear that this is why Republicans in Congress have already lost any political ground they might have gained by stopping the bailout train.
As each week brings another story of bailed out financial firms behaving badly, Democrats can complain for each constituency they want to throw money at by ripping Republicans for larding up the money guys.
No, no, no, no, no, no, NO!
Rep. Darryl Owens is pre-filing a bill to pour an extra $2 million into the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
No one in Kentucky is going to freeze to death living indoors this winter. We are going to have to get past the point of these feel-good appropriations should times really get hard in America.
Will someone please call Rep. Owens and tell him to quit sending this garbage up and instead look for spending to cut?
No one in Kentucky is going to freeze to death living indoors this winter. We are going to have to get past the point of these feel-good appropriations should times really get hard in America.
Will someone please call Rep. Owens and tell him to quit sending this garbage up and instead look for spending to cut?
Who needs the lesson here?
Looks like Rep. Jim Glenn (D-Owensboro) wants to try again in the 2009 session with his 2008 bill that would require colleges to hand out personal finance materials to students.
Seems like a better idea to require legislators and Gov. Steve Beshear to get a clue about spending taxpayer dollars more wisely before they try to tell our students anything about managing their finances.
Since young people learn much more from behaviors they observe than from words they hear, I'm guessing what's being picked up on campus now by those who pay attention to Frankfort is to spend all you have as soon as you can and start immediately whining for more.
Seems like a better idea to require legislators and Gov. Steve Beshear to get a clue about spending taxpayer dollars more wisely before they try to tell our students anything about managing their finances.
Since young people learn much more from behaviors they observe than from words they hear, I'm guessing what's being picked up on campus now by those who pay attention to Frankfort is to spend all you have as soon as you can and start immediately whining for more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)